@article{10.11648/j.sf.20210201.12,
  author = {Deressa Tesfaye and Dugasa Gerenfes},
  title = {Nutrient Components and Relation with Resistance Potential of Field Pea Genotypes Seeds to ‘Callosobruchus chinensis L.’ Under Laboratory Conditions},
  journal = {Science Frontiers},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {8-16},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sf.20210201.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20210201.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sf.20210201.12},
  abstract = {Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is among the major food crops grown globally for its high protein content. However there is no detailed nutrient composition profile and recently challenged with a storage pest, Callosobruchus chinensis L. This study was carried out to know the nutrient composition and quantify the damage caused by the pest and identify the sources of resistance in the genotypes in Ethiopia. The study was conducted at Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC) in Ethiopia, during 2019. Nutrients were estimated in laboratory analysis and callosobruchus chinensis L. was used to challenge 26 field pea genotypes under no choice condition, in the laboratory. Results showed a significant differences (pPisum var. abyssinicum landraces (collections) number 1 to 10 those are mostly grey and grey/green seed color while the lowest nutrient composition and highest susceptibility values were obtained from the pisum sativum L. those are improved, introduced and crossed genotypes number 11 to 26 with white, creamy, dun, light green, mottled and brown. Within this fpcoll-30/07 had the lowest SI (4.06), followed by fpcoll-42/07 (4.47), fpcoll-2/07 (4.77) and fpcoll-31/07 (4.94) whereas Burkitu, Tegegnech and PDFPT P-313 MILKY had the highest SI (>10) (Table 4). Genotypes; fpcoll-1/07, fpcoll-2/07, fpcoll-28/07, fpcoll-29/07, fpcoll-30/07, fpcoll-31/07, fpcoll-40/07, fpcoll-41/07, fpcoll-42/07/ had high values (ppm) for; ca, k, mg, and zn, whereas all improved, introduced crossed line of considered field peal genotypes had low values (ppm) for the above nutrients. In general there is a possibility that promising field pea genotypes in both high nutrient composition and less susceptibility could be used in a future breeding system.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Nutrient Components and Relation with Resistance Potential of Field Pea Genotypes Seeds to ‘Callosobruchus chinensis L.’ Under Laboratory Conditions
AU  - Deressa Tesfaye
AU  - Dugasa Gerenfes
Y1  - 2021/05/31
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20210201.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sf.20210201.12
T2  - Science Frontiers
JF  - Science Frontiers
JO  - Science Frontiers
SP  - 8
EP  - 16
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7030
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20210201.12
AB  - Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is among the major food crops grown globally for its high protein content. However there is no detailed nutrient composition profile and recently challenged with a storage pest, Callosobruchus chinensis L. This study was carried out to know the nutrient composition and quantify the damage caused by the pest and identify the sources of resistance in the genotypes in Ethiopia. The study was conducted at Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC) in Ethiopia, during 2019. Nutrients were estimated in laboratory analysis and callosobruchus chinensis L. was used to challenge 26 field pea genotypes under no choice condition, in the laboratory. Results showed a significant differences (pPisum var. abyssinicum landraces (collections) number 1 to 10 those are mostly grey and grey/green seed color while the lowest nutrient composition and highest susceptibility values were obtained from the pisum sativum L. those are improved, introduced and crossed genotypes number 11 to 26 with white, creamy, dun, light green, mottled and brown. Within this fpcoll-30/07 had the lowest SI (4.06), followed by fpcoll-42/07 (4.47), fpcoll-2/07 (4.77) and fpcoll-31/07 (4.94) whereas Burkitu, Tegegnech and PDFPT P-313 MILKY had the highest SI (>10) (Table 4). Genotypes; fpcoll-1/07, fpcoll-2/07, fpcoll-28/07, fpcoll-29/07, fpcoll-30/07, fpcoll-31/07, fpcoll-40/07, fpcoll-41/07, fpcoll-42/07/ had high values (ppm) for; ca, k, mg, and zn, whereas all improved, introduced crossed line of considered field peal genotypes had low values (ppm) for the above nutrients. In general there is a possibility that promising field pea genotypes in both high nutrient composition and less susceptibility could be used in a future breeding system.
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
ER  - 

Copy | Download